Предшколски будизъм

Терминът предшколски будизъм се използва от някои учени^[1]относно будизма, който е съществувал преди да се появят различните подшколи на будизма. ^[2]

Други термини, които са били използвани, за да се назове този първи период на будизма, са: най-ранния будизъм, ^[3]^[4] първоначалния будизъм^[5] и будизъм на самия Буда.^[6]

Някои японски учени (като Накамура^[7] и Хиракава^[8]) използват термина Ранен будизъм, отнасяйки го към този първи период на будизма, и го причисляват към следващия период от най-ранните будистки школи като сектантски будизъм.^[9]

Пре-сектантския будизъм се отнася за будизма в периода между първата проповед на Гаутама Буда до първото трайно разцепление в Санга, които се е случило (според повечето учени) между Втория будистки събор и Третия будистки събор.^[10]Обаче, по-късно професор Хиракава, поставя първия разкол след смъртта на цар Ашока.^[11]

Източници

↑ for example: ... stressed that the written canon in Buddhism is sectarian from the outset, and that presectarian Buddhism must be deduced from the writings as they now exist). Scripture of the Lotus Blossom of the Fine Dharma, Leon Kurvitz, 1976, Columbia University Press (quote via Google Scholar search-engine)
↑ sectsandsectarianism – Conclusion // Архивиран от оригинала на 2015-05-14. Посетен на 2015-04-21.
↑ The Earliest Buddhism,’’ How Buddhism Began, Richard F. Gombrich, Munshiram Manoharlal, 1997, p. 11 -12
↑ It would be hypocritical to assert that nothing can be said about the doctrine of earliest Buddhism ... the basic ideas of Buddhism found in the canonical writings could very well have been proclaimed by him [the Buddha], transmitted and developed by his disciples and, finally, codified in fixed formulas. J.W. De Jong, 1993: The Beginnings of Buddhism, in The Eastern Buddhist, vol. 26, no. 2, p. 25
↑ a reconstruction of the original Buddhism presupposed by the traditions of the different schools known to us. AK Warder, Indian Buddhism, 1999, 3rd edition.
↑ This kernel of doctrine is presumably common Buddhism of the period "before the schisms of the fourth and third centuries BC. It may be substantially the Buddhism of the Buddha himself, A. K. Warder, Indian Buddhism, 1999, 3rd edition.
↑ Indian Buddhism, Japan, 1980, reprinted Motilal, Delhi, 1987, 1989, table of contents
↑ History of Indian Buddhism, volume 1, Shinjūsha, Tokyo, 1974, English translation Hawai'i University Press, Honolulu, 1990,
↑ History of Indian Buddhism, volume 1, Shinjūsha, Tokyo, 1974, English translation Hawai'i University Press, Honolulu, 1990,
↑ Virtually all later sources agree that the first schism within the early Buddhist community occurred with the separation of the Mahasamghika school, or those of the great community, from the remaining monks referred to as Sthaviras, or the elders. MacMillan Encyclopedia of Buddhism, 2004, page 502
↑ History of Indian Buddhism, volume 1, Shinjūsha, Tokyo, 1974, English translation Hawai'i University Press, Honolulu, 1990, page 94: Thus serious disputes arose within the early Buddhist order's monks before Aśoka's reign, but the order did not actually split into schools until after Aśoka's death.

[1] r example: ... stressed that the written canon in Buddhism is sectarian from the outset, and that presectarian Buddhism must be deduced from the writings as they now exist). Scripture of the Lotus Blossom of the Fine Dharma, Leon Kurvitz, 1976, Columbia University Press (quote via Google Scholar search-engine)

[2] sectsandsectarianism – Conclusion // Архивиран от оригинала на 2015-05-14. Посетен на 2015-04-21.

[3] The Earliest Buddhism,’’ How Buddhism Began, Richard F. Gombrich, Munshiram Manoharlal, 1997, p. 11 -12

[4] It would be hypocritical to assert that nothing can be said about the doctrine of earliest Buddhism ... the basic ideas of Buddhism found in the canonical writings could very well have been proclaimed by him [the Buddha], transmitted and developed by his disciples and, finally, codified in fixed formulas. J.W. De Jong, 1993: The Beginnings of Buddhism, in The Eastern Buddhist, vol. 26, no. 2, p. 25

[5] reconstruction of the original Buddhism presupposed by the traditions of the different schools known to us. AK Warder, Indian Buddhism, 1999, 3rd edition.

[6] This kernel of doctrine is presumably common Buddhism of the period "before the schisms of the fourth and third centuries BC. It may be substantially the Buddhism of the Buddha himself, A. K. Warder, Indian Buddhism, 1999, 3rd edition.

[7] Indian Buddhism, Japan, 1980, reprinted Motilal, Delhi, 1987, 1989, table of contents

[8] History of Indian Buddhism, volume 1, Shinjūsha, Tokyo, 1974, English translation Hawai'i University Press, Honolulu, 1990,

[9] History of Indian Buddhism, volume 1, Shinjūsha, Tokyo, 1974, English translation Hawai'i University Press, Honolulu, 1990,

[10] Virtually all later sources agree that the first schism within the early Buddhist community occurred with the separation of the Mahasamghika school, or those of the great community, from the remaining monks referred to as Sthaviras, or the elders. MacMillan Encyclopedia of Buddhism, 2004, page 502

[11] History of Indian Buddhism, volume 1, Shinjūsha, Tokyo, 1974, English translation Hawai'i University Press, Honolulu, 1990, page 94: Thus serious disputes arose within the early Buddhist order's monks before Aśoka's reign, but the order did not actually split into schools until after Aśoka's death.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]