Viewing abuse filter 2: Нов потребител премахва бележки

Параметри на филтъра

Идентификатор на филтър:	2
Описание: (публично достъпно)
Статистики:	От последните 771 действия, този филтър съвпадна с 7 от тях (0,91%). Средното му време на изпълнение е 0,33 ms, а изразходва 2,4 условия от лимита за условия.
Условия:	!"confirmed" in user_groups & page_namespace == 0 /* narrow down edits to just those dealing with refs/reflike templates / & removed_lines irlike "</?ref\b\|{{\s(?:hrf\|[es]fn)\b" /* this edit_delta ignores large blankings treated by another filter / & edit_delta >= -3000 / no added lines usually means a blanking which is dealt with by other filters / & length(added_lines) > 0 & !added_lines irlike "^#(?:виж\|пренасочване\|redirect)\s\[\[" & ( /* matches normal or self-closing refs, excluding self-referencing ones; also matches specific reflike templates / rx_match := "(?i)<ref\b[^>]+(?<!/)>(?:[^<.]++\|\.(?!wikipedia\.org\b)\|<(?!/?ref\b))+</ref\b\|<ref\b[^>]/>\|{{\s(?:hrf\|[es]fn)\b(?:[^{}]++\|({(?:[^{}]++\|(?1))}))+}}"; /* removes comments and empty refs/reflike templates / rx_clean := "(?i)<!--(?:[^-]++\|-(?!->))+-->\|<ref\s>\s</ref\s>\|<ref\s/>(?:\s</ref\s>)?\|{{\s(?:hrf\|[es]fn)(?:\s\\|(?:[^=\\|]=)?)\s}}"; / compare match counts of removed and added / rcount(rx_match, str_replace_regexp(removed_lines, rx_clean, "")) > rcount(rx_match, str_replace_regexp(added_lines, rx_clean, "")) ) !"confirmed" in user_groups & page_namespace == 0 / narrow down edits to just those dealing with refs/reflike templates / & removed_lines irlike "</?ref\b\|{{\s(?:hrf\|[es]fn)\b" /* this edit_delta ignores large blankings treated by another filter / & edit_delta >= -3000 / no added lines usually means a blanking which is dealt with by other filters / & length(added_lines) > 0 & !added_lines irlike "^#(?:виж\|пренасочване\|redirect)\s\[\[" & ( /* matches normal or self-closing refs, excluding self-referencing ones; also matches specific reflike templates / rx_match := "(?i)<ref\b[^>]+(?<!/)>(?:[^<.]++\|\.(?!wikipedia\.org\b)\|<(?!/?ref\b))+</ref\b\|<ref\b[^>]/>\|{{\s(?:hrf\|[es]fn)\b(?:[^{}]++\|({(?:[^{}]++\|(?1))}))+}}"; /* removes comments and empty refs/reflike templates / rx_clean := "(?i)<!--(?:[^-]++\|-(?!->))+-->\|<ref\s>\s</ref\s>\|<ref\s/>(?:\s</ref\s>)?\|{{\s(?:hrf\|[es]fn)(?:\s\\|(?:[^=\\|]=)?)\s}}"; / compare match counts of removed and added */ rcount(rx_match, str_replace_regexp(removed_lines, rx_clean, "")) > rcount(rx_match, str_replace_regexp(added_lines, rx_clean, "")) )
Забележки:	"<ref\|</ref" split for clarity Appears to get more and better hits on referenced info now too. Apparently, previous version wasn't working properly. --Mgm Switched on. - It Is Me Here Tagging instead of disallowing, there are plenty of good reasons to remove references. -- Mgm Oh, is this for all references? Wasn't there one regarding removing a {{Reflist}} template? - It Is Me Here That one (filter 79) was a test, and it doesn't appear to be working properly. It hasn't caught anything for at least 24 hours. - Mgm removed private flag, unnecessary -- Zzuuzz Updated format that should also catch named references and avoid the old reference grouping tag. --Mgm Filter 79 now working properly, removing line that specifies reflist. Working on better regex to avoid <references/> being hit with this one --Mgm Changing to edit_delta <= -1000 from >= -1000; seems like this was the intent. >= and <= comparisons are based on actual value, not absolute value. Correct me if this was the intent. Also, we are getting some false positives on this, see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interstate_5_in_Washington&diff=279452062&oldid=278504317 - Hersfold >= is correct. It is supposed to exclude large removals from being evaluated since they're covered by blanking filters. It was an error in the regex. Instead of allowing for <ref name="whatever">, the regex allowed choosing between <ref> and <ref name>, the last of which obviously didn't work. -- Mgm added note in filter to avoid confusion --Mgm Altered regex to treat refs as whole blocks, to avoid situation where a duplicate ref is changed to a named ref (<ref>Blah</ref> --> <ref name=foo/>). Now won't catch users removing one end of a ref though. Might have ec'd with cmt above, but can't tell in this wierd system :D --HM Okay... I THINK this is finally a correct regex that: 1) grabs <ref> ... </ref> as entire blocks 2) grabs <ref name="foo"/> 3) ignores <references/> 4) allows newline breaks between <ref> and </ref> tags. 5) grabs only consecutive <ref>, </ref> pairs (as opposed to jumping from the first <ref> to the last </ref>). -DF Restored original version, added exclusions for naming references and removing closing tags of named references. --Mgm Added comments for clarity --Mgm Too many false positives, setting to log only. --Conti From Coppertwig: A more exact count might be obtained by defining a ref-opening as either "<ref>" or "<ref name" and a ref-closing as either "</ref>" or "ref name ... />". (With the named reference, the same tag will sometimes count as both an opening and a closing.) The code might look something like this (assuming rcount expects regular expressions): /* count of removed ref-openings exceeds count of added ref-openings, or count of removed ref-closings exceeds count of added ref-closings; named refs with slashes count as both openings and closings. / & (rcount("(<ref>\|<ref\sname)",removed_lines) > rcount("(<ref>\|<ref\sname)",added_lines) \| rcount("(</ref>\|<ref\sname[^>/]/>)",removed_lines) > rcount("(</ref>\|<ref\sname[^>/]*/>)",added_lines) Adjusted delta to -3000 due to a sock removing references that has been missed due to the total removed content. Ref [[User:Ryulong/Sandbox#Ref_removing_vandal]] - Shirik 24 Jan I replaced \sname with \s(name\|group). - Ruslik Something 'wrong' here .. it catches also '<ref></ref>' (i.e., empty tags, as included in the article creation wizard). They should be excluded.
Флагове:	Скриване на детайлите за този филтър от публичен достъп Включване на този филтър Отбелязване като изтрито
Последна промяна на филтъра:	22:05, 6 март 2024 от Ted Masters (беседа \| приноси)
История:	Преглед на историята на този филтър
Инструменти:	Експортиране на този филтър към друго уики {"data":{"rules":"!\"confirmed\" in user_groups\r\n\u0026 page_namespace == 0\r\n/* narrow down edits to just those dealing with refs/reflike templates /\r\n\u0026 removed_lines irlike \"\u003C/?ref\\b\|{{\\s(?:hrf\|[es]fn)\\b\"\r\n/* this edit_delta ignores large blankings treated by another filter /\r\n\u0026 edit_delta \u003E= -3000\r\n/ no added lines usually means a blanking which is dealt with by other filters /\r\n\u0026 length(added_lines) \u003E 0\r\n\u0026 !added_lines irlike \"^#(?:\u0432\u0438\u0436\|\u043f\u0440\u0435\u043d\u0430\u0441\u043e\u0447\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0435\|redirect)\\s\\[\\[\"\r\n\u0026 (\r\n /* matches normal or self-closing refs, excluding self-referencing ones; also matches specific reflike templates /\r\n rx_match := \"(?i)\u003Cref\\b[^\u003E]+(?\u003C!/)\u003E(?:[^\u003C.]++\|\\.(?!wikipedia\\.org\\b)\|\u003C(?!/?ref\\b))+\u003C/ref\\b\|\u003Cref\\b[^\u003E]/\u003E\|{{\\s(?:hrf\|[es]fn)\\b(?:[^{}]++\|({(?:[^{}]++\|(?1))}))+}}\";\r\n /* removes comments and empty refs/reflike templates /\r\n rx_clean := \"(?i)\u003C!--(?:[^-]++\|-(?!-\u003E))+--\u003E\|\u003Cref\\s\u003E\\s\u003C/ref\\s\u003E\|\u003Cref\\s/\u003E(?:\\s\u003C/ref\\s\u003E)?\|{{\\s(?:hrf\|[es]fn)(?:\\s\\\|(?:[^=\\\|]=)?)\\s}}\";\r\n / compare match counts of removed and added /\r\n rcount(rx_match, str_replace_regexp(removed_lines, rx_clean, \"\")) \u003E rcount(rx_match, str_replace_regexp(added_lines, rx_clean, \"\"))\r\n)","name":"\u041d\u043e\u0432 \u043f\u043e\u0442\u0440\u0435\u0431\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b \u043f\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0430\u0445\u0432\u0430 \u0431\u0435\u043b\u0435\u0436\u043a\u0438","comments":"\"\u003Cref\|\u003C/ref\" split for clarity\r\n\r\nAppears to get more and better hits on referenced info now too. Apparently, previous version wasn't working properly. --Mgm\r\n\r\nSwitched on. - It Is Me Here\r\nTagging instead of disallowing, there are plenty of good reasons to remove references. -- Mgm\r\nOh, is this for all references? Wasn't there one regarding removing a {{Reflist}} template? - It Is Me Here\r\n That one (filter 79) was a test, and it doesn't appear to be working properly. It hasn't caught anything for at least 24 hours. - Mgm\r\nremoved private flag, unnecessary -- Zzuuzz\r\nUpdated format that should also catch named references and avoid the old reference grouping tag. --Mgm\r\nFilter 79 now working properly, removing line that specifies reflist. Working on better regex to avoid \u003Creferences/\u003E being hit with this one --Mgm\r\n\r\nChanging to edit_delta \u003C= -1000 from \u003E= -1000; seems like this was the intent. \u003E= and \u003C= comparisons are based on actual value, not absolute value. Correct me if this was the intent. Also, we are getting some false positives on this, see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interstate_5_in_Washington\u0026diff=279452062\u0026oldid=278504317 - Hersfold\r\n\r\n\u003E= is correct. It is supposed to exclude large removals from being evaluated since they're covered by blanking filters. It was an error in the regex. Instead of allowing for \u003Cref name=\"whatever\"\u003E, the regex allowed choosing between \u003Cref\u003E and \u003Cref name\u003E, the last of which obviously didn't work. -- Mgm\r\n\r\nadded note in filter to avoid confusion --Mgm\r\n\r\nAltered regex to treat refs as whole blocks, to avoid situation where a duplicate ref is changed to a named ref (\u003Cref\u003EBlah\u003C/ref\u003E --\u003E \u003Cref name=foo/\u003E). Now won't catch users removing one end of a ref though. Might have ec'd with cmt above, but can't tell in this wierd system :D --HM\r\n\r\n\r\nOkay... I THINK this is finally a correct regex that:\r\n\r\n 1) grabs \u003Cref\u003E ... \u003C/ref\u003E as entire blocks\r\n 2) grabs \u003Cref name=\"foo\"/\u003E\r\n 3) ignores \u003Creferences/\u003E\r\n 4) allows newline breaks between \u003Cref\u003E and \u003C/ref\u003E tags.\r\n 5) grabs only consecutive \u003Cref\u003E, \u003C/ref\u003E pairs (as opposed to jumping from the first \u003Cref\u003E to the last \u003C/ref\u003E).\r\n\r\n-DF\r\n\r\nRestored original version, added exclusions for naming references and removing closing tags of named references. --Mgm\r\n\r\nAdded comments for clarity --Mgm\r\n\r\nToo many false positives, setting to log only. --Conti\r\n\r\nFrom Coppertwig:\r\nA more exact count might be obtained by defining a ref-opening as either \"\u003Cref\u003E\" or \"\u003Cref name\" and a ref-closing as either \"\u003C/ref\u003E\" or \"ref name ... /\u003E\". (With the named reference, the same tag will sometimes count as both an opening and a closing.) The code might look something like this (assuming rcount expects regular expressions):\r\n\r\n/ count of removed ref-openings exceeds count of added ref-openings, or count of removed ref-closings exceeds count of added ref-closings; named refs with slashes count as both openings and closings. / \u0026 (rcount(\"(\u003Cref\u003E\|\u003Cref\\sname)\",removed_lines) \u003E rcount(\"(\u003Cref\u003E\|\u003Cref\\sname)\",added_lines) \| rcount(\"(\u003C/ref\u003E\|\u003Cref\\sname[^\u003E/]/\u003E)\",removed_lines) \u003E rcount(\"(\u003C/ref\u003E\|\u003Cref\\sname[^\u003E/]*/\u003E)\",added_lines)\r\n\r\nAdjusted delta to -3000 due to a sock removing references that has been missed due to the total removed content. Ref [[User:Ryulong/Sandbox#Ref_removing_vandal]] - Shirik 24 Jan\r\n\r\nI replaced \\sname with \\s(name\|group). - Ruslik\r\n\r\nSomething 'wrong' here .. it catches also '\u003Cref\u003E\u003C/ref\u003E' (i.e., empty tags, as included in the article creation wizard). They should be excluded.","group":"default","actions":{"tag":["\u041f\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0430\u0445\u043d\u0430\u0442\u0438 \u0438\u0437\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0446\u0438 \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0431\u0435\u043b\u0435\u0436\u043a\u0438"]},"enabled":true,"deleted":false,"privacylevel":0,"global":false},"actions":{"tag":["\u041f\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0430\u0445\u043d\u0430\u0442\u0438 \u0438\u0437\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0446\u0438 \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0431\u0435\u043b\u0435\u0436\u043a\u0438"]}}

Действия при съвпадение

Изпълнение на действията, само ако потребителят превиши определена честота на редакциите

Брой позволени действия:

Период от време (в секунди):

Ограничаване по групи:

user

Вж. документацията на mediawiki.org.

Извършване на следните действия след предупреждение на потребителя

Използвано системно съобщение за предупреждение:

Наименование на страница на друго съобщение:

(без представката „MediaWiki:“)

Ограничаване на потребителя да извърши въпросното действие

Използвано системно съобщение за забрана:

Наименование на друго системно съобщение:

(без представката „MediaWiki:“)

Отнемане на привилегията „Автоматично одобрен потребител“

Отбелязване на редакцията за по-нататъшно преглеждане

Етикети за прилагане:

Премахнати източници или бележки

Require the user to complete a CAPTCHA in order to proceed with the action. Users with permission to skip a CAPTCHA are exempt.